Découvrez les évènements passés et à venir dans le monde entier et en ligne, qu’ils soient organisés par le CIFOR-ICRAF ou auxquels participent nos chercheurs.

{{menu_nowledge_desc}}.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Application of DRIFT-FTIR spectroscopy for quantitative prediction of simple sugars in two local and two Floridian mango (Mangifera indica L.) cultivars in Kenya

Export citation

Background: Mangoes are fruits of nutritional importance in Kenya. The fruits vary in their sugars depending on cultivar type and ripening stage. Current methods of sugar content analysis are based on HPLC methods, which are accurate but expensive and time-consuming. We evaluated the potential of diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy as a rapid tool for quantitative prediction of fructose and glucose sugars in the pulp of Kenyan mangoes.Methods: Principal component analysis and partial least regression models were developed using the first derivative DRIFT spectra (400–4000 cm1) to predict fructose and glucose sugars. A factorial analysis of variance compared effects of site (three locations), cultivar type (four cultivars), fruit position (inside/outside), and their interactions on fructose and glucose contents.Results: The principal component analysis scores plot using components 1 and 2 explained 75 and 8% of the variance, respectively, with no clear grouping either by sites or cultivars. The PLS range for glucose was R2 = 0.80, SECV = 0.55, and RPD = 11.52 and fructose R2 = 0.70, SECV = 0.28, and RPD = 11.52. Site (F (2, 265) = 18.12, p < 0.05, 2 = 0.02), cultivar type (F (3, 256) = 4.44, p < 0.05, 2 = 0.05), and fruit position (F (1, 259) = 7.62, p < 0.05, 2 = 0.03) had a significant effect on glucose content and not on fructose content. However, interactions between these three factors were not significant, p > 0.05. In general, fruits outside the canopy had higher fructose and glucose contents than those within the canopy.Conclusions: DRIFTS coupled with chemometric

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40543-017-0130-0
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:

Related publications