CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Impacts of the Hutan kamasyarakatan social forestry program in the Sumberjaya watershed, West Lampung district of Sumatra, Indonesia

Export citation

This paper investigates the impacts of a social forestry program in Indonesia Hutan Kamasyarakatan (HKm) based on analysis of a survey of 640 HKm and comparable non-HKm pl ots in the Sumberjaya watershed of southern Sumatra and of the households operating those plots. The HKm program provides groups of farmers with secure-tenure permits to continue farming on st ate Protection Forest land and in exchange for protecting remaining natural forestland planting multistrata agroforests and using recommended soil and water conservation (SWC) measures on their coffee plantations. Using farmers’ perceptions econometric techniques and propensity score matching we investigated the impacts of the HKm program on perceived land tenure security land purchase prices farmers’ investments in tree planting and SWC measures and plot-level profits. A significant fraction of HKm group members are not aware of the program or fully aware of its requirements. Although farmers who are aware of the program perceive its strong effects on tenure security and land values we found insignificant impacts on the actual purchase prices of plots. Nevertheless our survey revealed that the HKm pr ogram has contributed to increased planting of timber and multipurpose trees. We did not find significant impacts on investments in SWC measures or on soil fertility management practices. HKm has had mixed impacts on profits with timber trees reducing profitability because timber harvesting is not allo wed and multipurpose nontimber trees contributing to increased profits. The policy implications of these finding s are also discussed in the paper.

Related publications