CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

The impact of improved fallows and biomass transfer on household poverty indicators in western Kenya: methodology and empirical results from baseline survey

Export citation

This case study explores the development dissemination adoption and impact of improved tree fallows in rural western Kenya. The processes of technology development and dissemination throughout the region are described and analyzed. To analyze adoption and impact the paper applies a variety of different data collection methods as well as samples from both pilot areas where researchers maintained a significant presen ce and non-pilot areas where farmers learned of the technologies through other channels. Sample sizes for the quantitative analysis ranged from almost 2000 households for measuring the adoption process to just over 100 households for measuring impact indicators. Qualitative methods included long-term case studies for 40 households and focus group discussions involving 16 different groups. The paper describes the ways in which farmers used and modified improved fallow practices. Discussion also examines the types of households using fallows and benefiting from their use. Empirical results suggest that improved fallows almost always double on-farm maize yields. In addition the data indicates that poor households use improved fallows at much greater rate (about 30 percent) than they do fertilizer (8 percent) though on average the size of fallow plots remains small at 440m2 . As a result despite these promising signs the improved fallow systems were not found to be linked to improved household level food security or poverty indicators primarily primarily because the size of the fields under the agroforestry systems was on average quite small.
    Publication year



    Rommelse, R.


    Agroforestry, Biomass, Fallow, Households, Poverty, Surveys

Related publications