Acknowledging Our Generous
Supporters
CIFOR is highly
indebted to numerous countries, institutions and individuals whose support is vital for
the centres work. Foremost among those who deserve a large share of the credit for
CIFORs achievements are the partner institutions and scientists in the developing
countries where CIFOR is engaged inresearch.
These partners bring major
resources, intellectual capacity and local knowledge to bear on problems of tropical
forests and the communities they servemaking CIFOR truly a centre without
walls.
Several institutions have provided
particularly strong support in recent years as CIFOR established its regional offices:
EMBRAPA in Brazil, the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture in Cameroon, and in
Zimbabwe, the University of Zimbabwe and its Institute of Environmental Studies.
Major recognitionand
thanksis also due to the governments and organisations that provide generous
financial support. Since CIFOR was established in 1993, its total funding has grown
steadily. In 2000, the top 10 donors to CIFOR were the European Commission, Germany, the
International Fund for Agricultural Development, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden,
the United Kingdom, the United States and the World Bank.
CIFOR receives funds in
two streams: institutional funding, which currently makes up nearly half of the annual
budget, and targeted funding for specific projects. In the early years of CIFOR, the bulk
of its budget was unrestricted; over time, financial support has increasingly shifted
toward targeted funding. These two funding streams are complementary, and both are
essential for CIFOR tooperate.
Institutional funds
provided the flexibility CIFOR needed early on to develop its fledgling programme. This
kind of funding has benefited all of CIFORs main research programmes and is critical
for the centres basic operations. It enables CIFOR to undertake new activities until
long-term funding has been identified, while targeted money provides added resources to
tackle particular problems of concern. This combined funding has been indispensable for
CIFOR to expand its work into the major tropical regions, increase capacity building in
developing countries, strengthen the dissemination of scientific knowledge and provide
expertise on forestry issues to international policy making processes.
CIFOR pledges to
maintain its track record of responsible stewardship of the financial resources it
receives, and thanks its many donors for continuing to provide the funds that make it
possible for the centre to fulfill itsmission.
Japan and CIFOR: An
Enduring Partnership
Since CIFOR was
established in 1993, Japan has been one its most committed partners in working to promote
sustainable forest management in developing countries. Having a member from Japan on
CIFORs Board of Trustees from the beginning has solidified that relationship.
Japan has a strong
commitment to forestry, which is rooted in the national culture. The Japanese people
treasure their forests not only as a source of material needs but also for spiritual
benefits and social values. At home, Japan has an exemplary record of sustainable
management and use of its forests, and shares its knowledge and technology in this area
with developing countries.
Japan has consistently
been one of the leading sources of funds for CIFOR, particularly for institutional
funding. This has been especially important in giving CIFOR the flexibility needed to
build a core scientific staff and a solid research programme with activities in many
countries and the international community. Japan has also provided targeted funding to
support research in specific areas.
To complement these
financial contributions, CIFOR is working to increase direct scientific cooperation with
Japans forest research community. Initiatives are expected to include reciprocal
exchange visits by scientists, student internships and more forestry project partnerships
in developing countries.
Plans are also
underway to better inform scientists in Japan about CIFOR and its work. Says Shigeo
Kobayashi, who coordinates overseas research at the Japan Forestry and Forest Products
Research Institute: There are many in Japan who would like to cooperate with CIFOR
if only they knew more about it. I therefore look forward to seeing CIFOR active at
selected events of the Japanese forestry community. Kobayashi was recently named a
CIFOR Affiliate Scientist in recognition of his contributions to tropical forestry
research and his role in improving the CIFOR-Japan partnership.
Donors
Schedule of Grant Revenue
For the years ended 31 December 2000 and 1999
(US $000)
Institutional Grants |
2000
|
1999 |
Australia |
254 |
255 |
Austria |
80 |
80
|
Belgium |
163 |
121 |
Canada |
267 |
267 |
Denmark |
128 |
147 |
Finland |
317 |
355 |
France |
89 |
92 |
Germany |
196 |
274 |
Indonesia |
57 |
200 |
Japan |
636 |
1,020 |
Netherlands |
973 |
718 |
Norway |
291 |
318 |
Philippines |
12 |
14 |
Spain |
25 |
25 |
Sweden |
224 |
238 |
Switzerland |
220 |
205 |
U.S.A |
575 |
550 |
World Bank |
1,670 |
1,400 |
Sub-total |
6,177 |
6,279 |
Targeted
Grants |
2000 |
1999 |
African Timber
Organisation |
51 |
- |
Asian
Development Bank |
204
|
91
|
Australian
Centre for Int. Agricultural Research |
67
|
71 |
Berau Forest
Management Project |
6 |
- |
Brazil (EMBRAPA) |
30
|
(4) |
Canada |
43 |
123 |
CGIAR
Secretariat |
21 |
- |
Chemonics
International Inc. |
5 |
- |
CIAT (PRGA
Programme) |
4 |
2 |
Denmark |
76 |
111 |
European
Commission |
1,633 |
585 |
European Space
Agency |
- |
67
|
Finland |
- |
22 |
Food and
Agriculture Organisation of the U.N. |
17 |
- |
Ford Foundation |
20 |
13 |
Forest Trends |
6 |
- |
France |
194 |
385 |
Germany
(GTZ/BMZ) |
207 |
38 |
Inter-American
Development Bank |
- |
25 |
International
Centre for Research in Agroforestry |
44
|
- |
International
Development Research Centre |
86 |
64 |
International
Fund for Agricultural Development |
403 |
418 |
International
Plant Genetic Resources Institute |
56
|
5 |
International
Tropical Timber Organisation |
317 |
335 |
Japan |
650 |
1,250
|
MacArthur
Foundation |
127 |
84
|
NOAA of the U.S. |
11 |
- |
Netherlands |
45 |
32 |
Norway |
73 |
53 |
Overseas
Development Institute |
4 |
11 |
Pact |
- |
33 |
Protierra/Inifom |
- |
45 |
Rockefeller
Foundation |
10 |
62
|
Spain |
- |
13 |
Sweden |
302
|
224
|
Swiss National
Science Foundation |
1 |
- |
Switzerland |
104 |
147 |
The Nature
Conservancy |
23
|
12
|
Tropical Forest
Foundation |
70 |
- |
U. S. A. |
313 |
147 |
United Kingdom
(DfID) |
775 |
519 |
UNESCO |
- |
1 |
United Nations
Environment Programme |
6 |
|
U.S. Forest
Service |
160 |
110 |
University of
Wales |
5 |
- |
World Bank |
2 |
96 |
World
Conservation Union (IUCN) |
4 |
- |
World Resources
Institute |
51 |
- |
World Wildlife
Fund |
140 |
45
|
Sub-total |
6,366 |
5,235 |
TOTAL
GRANTS
|
12,543 |
11,514 |
|