CIFOR's existing set of criteria and indicators (C&I) was evaluated during a workshop in the Bulungan research forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. It has been recognized that CIFOR's biodiversity C&I were too academic and were impractical for field application. This report presents: a) review and assessment of the suitability of CIFOR's generic biodiversity Critetia & Indicators (C&I), b) evalutation whether CIFOR's generic biodiversity C&I adequately assessed the quality of management performance, c) suggestions developed to adapt the biodiversity components of the CIFOR C&I generic template to local conditions, d) evaluation and to suggestion to improve to the wording in current biodiversity C&I manuals, and e) relevant recommendations pertaining to the implementation of the C&I, and the agenda for future research on these.
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
Download:
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001165Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
Export citation:
RIS (.ris)
TI - Field test of CIFOR’s ecological criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: Bulungan Research Forest East Kalimantan, Indonesia 1-12 September 1999
AU - Poulsen, J.
AU - ed.
AB - CIFOR's existing set of criteria and indicators (C&I) was evaluated during a workshop in the Bulungan research forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. It has been recognized that CIFOR's biodiversity C&I were too academic and were impractical for field application. This report presents: a) review and assessment of the suitability of CIFOR's generic biodiversity Critetia & Indicators (C&I), b) evalutation whether CIFOR's generic biodiversity C&I adequately assessed the quality of management performance, c) suggestions developed to adapt the biodiversity components of the CIFOR C&I generic template to local conditions, d) evaluation and to suggestion to improve to the wording in current biodiversity C&I manuals, and e) relevant recommendations pertaining to the implementation of the C&I, and the agenda for future research on these.
PY - 2002
PB - Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
PP - Bogor, Indonesia
UR - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/1165/
DO - https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001165
KW - assessment, biodiversity, center for international forestry research, certification, criteria, guidelines, handbooks, indicator, indicators, social scientists
ER -Endnote (.ciw)
%T Field test of CIFOR’s ecological criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: Bulungan Research Forest East Kalimantan, Indonesia 1-12 September 1999
%A Poulsen, J.
%A ed.
%D 2002
%I Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
%C Bogor, Indonesia
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/1165/
%R https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/001165
%X CIFOR's existing set of criteria and indicators (C&I) was evaluated during a workshop in the Bulungan research forest, East Kalimantan, Indonesia. It has been recognized that CIFOR's biodiversity C&I were too academic and were impractical for field application. This report presents: a) review and assessment of the suitability of CIFOR's generic biodiversity Critetia & Indicators (C&I), b) evalutation whether CIFOR's generic biodiversity C&I adequately assessed the quality of management performance, c) suggestions developed to adapt the biodiversity components of the CIFOR C&I generic template to local conditions, d) evaluation and to suggestion to improve to the wording in current biodiversity C&I manuals, and e) relevant recommendations pertaining to the implementation of the C&I, and the agenda for future research on these.
%K assessment
%K biodiversity
%K center for international forestry research
%K certification
%K criteria
%K guidelines
%K handbooks
%K indicator
%K indicators
%K social scientists
Publisher
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia
Publication year
2002
ISBN
979-8764-91-9
Authors
Language
English
Keywords
assessment, biodiversity, center for international forestry research, certification, criteria, guidelines, handbooks, indicator, indicators, social scientists
