CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

Addressing the paradox – the divergence between smallholders’ preference and actual adoption of agricultural innovations

Addressing the paradox – the divergence between smallholders’ preference and actual adoption of agricultural innovations
Experiences in smallholder contexts indicate frequent mismatches between technologies introduced and needs of farmers who must make complex decisions in reallocating their limited resources under highly risky ecological and market contexts. This study proposes a cost- and time-effective, easy-to-implement approach to identify farmers’ priorities and critical intervention areas, and presents its application in guiding an agroforestry strategy in Rwanda. It was found that different tree species have distinctive enabling vs. constraining conditions under different agroecological contexts in the perspective of smallholder farmers. Tree species preferred by farmers were not necessarily widely adopted if multitudes of conditions were not enabling. The essential conditions for sustainable adoption include: quality materials/inputs are available; technologies are compatible with existing local farming systems; they are resilient to climate risks/resistant to pests-diseases; management is not complicated; and, there is guaranteed access to markets. The results show that there will not be a silver bullet national strategy to scale up agroforestry. Instead a matrix kind of strategies -to promote enabling conditions and address constraining conditions for priority species in specific agroecologies- will be required. The proposed concept should be further refined for wider agricultural technology transfer debates to break the myths of low uptakes by smallholders.

This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1539384
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:


Export citation:
TI  - Addressing the paradox – the divergence between smallholders’ preference and actual adoption of agricultural innovations 
AU  - Liyama, M. 
AU  - Ndayambaje, J.D. 
AU  - Musana, B.S. 
AU  - Ndoli, A. 
AU  - Mowo, G.J. 
AU  - Garrity, D.P. 
AU  - Ling, S. 
AU  - Ruganzu, V. 
AU  - Mukuralinda, A. 
AB  - Experiences in smallholder contexts indicate frequent mismatches between technologies introduced and needs of farmers who must make complex decisions in reallocating their limited resources under highly risky ecological and market contexts. This study proposes a cost- and time-effective, easy-to-implement approach to identify farmers’ priorities and critical intervention areas, and presents its application in guiding an agroforestry strategy in Rwanda. It was found that different tree species have distinctive enabling vs. constraining conditions under different agroecological contexts in the perspective of smallholder farmers. Tree species preferred by farmers were not necessarily widely adopted if multitudes of conditions were not enabling. The essential conditions for sustainable adoption include: quality materials/inputs are available; technologies are compatible with existing local farming systems; they are resilient to climate risks/resistant to pests-diseases; management is not complicated; and, there is guaranteed access to markets. The results show that there will not be a silver bullet national strategy to scale up agroforestry. Instead a matrix kind of strategies -to promote enabling conditions and address constraining conditions for priority species in specific agroecologies- will be required. The proposed concept should be further refined for wider agricultural technology transfer debates to break the myths of low uptakes by smallholders. 
PY  - 2018 
UR  - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/19168/ 
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1539384 
KW  - adoption, agricultural production, small scale farming 
ER  -
%T Addressing the paradox – the divergence between smallholders’ preference and actual adoption of agricultural innovations 
%A Liyama, M. 
%A Ndayambaje, J.D. 
%A Musana, B.S. 
%A Ndoli, A. 
%A Mowo, G.J. 
%A Garrity, D.P. 
%A Ling, S. 
%A Ruganzu, V. 
%A Mukuralinda, A. 
%D 2018 
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/19168/ 
%R https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2018.1539384 
%X Experiences in smallholder contexts indicate frequent mismatches between technologies introduced and needs of farmers who must make complex decisions in reallocating their limited resources under highly risky ecological and market contexts. This study proposes a cost- and time-effective, easy-to-implement approach to identify farmers’ priorities and critical intervention areas, and presents its application in guiding an agroforestry strategy in Rwanda. It was found that different tree species have distinctive enabling vs. constraining conditions under different agroecological contexts in the perspective of smallholder farmers. Tree species preferred by farmers were not necessarily widely adopted if multitudes of conditions were not enabling. The essential conditions for sustainable adoption include: quality materials/inputs are available; technologies are compatible with existing local farming systems; they are resilient to climate risks/resistant to pests-diseases; management is not complicated; and, there is guaranteed access to markets. The results show that there will not be a silver bullet national strategy to scale up agroforestry. Instead a matrix kind of strategies -to promote enabling conditions and address constraining conditions for priority species in specific agroecologies- will be required. The proposed concept should be further refined for wider agricultural technology transfer debates to break the myths of low uptakes by smallholders. 
%K adoption 
%K agricultural production 
%K small scale farming