The recent reframing of global biodiversity policy from (unsuccessfully) dealing with ‘underlying causes’ to focusing on spatial allocations and planning implies renewed urgency of reconciling goal-oriented spatial planning of rights to use land and water with harmony-oriented ‘co-production’ by the relevant stakeholders. Current understanding of spatial and temporal variation in the balance between goal-oriented instrumental and harmony-oriented relational values of nature recognizes different decision-making styles. Taking Indonesia and Vietnam as examples, we explored how current tools and processes of land-use planning for multiple environmental services (LUMENS) deal with that balance, and what further steps may be needed to meet current expectations, across all sustainable development goals in a mega-diverse country with an export-oriented economy and its changing norms. So far, relational values are expressed primarily as stakeholder preferences through the ‘co-production’ process, consultations, and priority setting, while instrumental values and economic multipliers are formally presented.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101333Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
Export citation:
RIS (.ris)
TI - Integrating relational and instrumental values of nature in planning land use for multiple ecosystem services (LUMENS): tools and process
AU - Dewi, S.
AU - Mulia, R.
AU - Johana, F.
AU - Ekadinata, A.
AU - van Noordwijk, M.
AB - The recent reframing of global biodiversity policy from (unsuccessfully) dealing with ‘underlying causes’ to focusing on spatial allocations and planning implies renewed urgency of reconciling goal-oriented spatial planning of rights to use land and water with harmony-oriented ‘co-production’ by the relevant stakeholders. Current understanding of spatial and temporal variation in the balance between goal-oriented instrumental and harmony-oriented relational values of nature recognizes different decision-making styles. Taking Indonesia and Vietnam as examples, we explored how current tools and processes of land-use planning for multiple environmental services (LUMENS) deal with that balance, and what further steps may be needed to meet current expectations, across all sustainable development goals in a mega-diverse country with an export-oriented economy and its changing norms. So far, relational values are expressed primarily as stakeholder preferences through the ‘co-production’ process, consultations, and priority setting, while instrumental values and economic multipliers are formally presented.
PY - 2023
UR - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/35245/
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101333
KW - ecosystem services, land use planning, sustainable development, value systems
ER -Endnote (.ciw)
%T Integrating relational and instrumental values of nature in planning land use for multiple ecosystem services (LUMENS): tools and process
%A Dewi, S.
%A Mulia, R.
%A Johana, F.
%A Ekadinata, A.
%A van Noordwijk, M.
%D 2023
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/35245/
%R https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101333
%X The recent reframing of global biodiversity policy from (unsuccessfully) dealing with ‘underlying causes’ to focusing on spatial allocations and planning implies renewed urgency of reconciling goal-oriented spatial planning of rights to use land and water with harmony-oriented ‘co-production’ by the relevant stakeholders. Current understanding of spatial and temporal variation in the balance between goal-oriented instrumental and harmony-oriented relational values of nature recognizes different decision-making styles. Taking Indonesia and Vietnam as examples, we explored how current tools and processes of land-use planning for multiple environmental services (LUMENS) deal with that balance, and what further steps may be needed to meet current expectations, across all sustainable development goals in a mega-diverse country with an export-oriented economy and its changing norms. So far, relational values are expressed primarily as stakeholder preferences through the ‘co-production’ process, consultations, and priority setting, while instrumental values and economic multipliers are formally presented.
%K ecosystem services
%K land use planning
%K sustainable development
%K value systems
Publication year
2023
ISSN
1877-3435
Authors
Dewi, S.; Mulia, R.; Johana, F.; Ekadinata, A.; van Noordwijk, M.
Language
English
Keywords
ecosystem services, land use planning, sustainable development, value systems
Source
Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 64: 101333
Geographic
Indonesia, Viet Nam
