The CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs) embodied a fundamental shift in the approach to research for development. In addition to producing highquality science, the CRPs explicitly assume shared responsibility for achieving economic and human development outcomes. This shift required new ways of working for positioning, prioritizing and planning of research, and better ways of monitoring and evaluating research. When the Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA) program was established in 2011 it responded to the latter challenge by proposing to develop and use theory-based approaches for monitoring and evaluating outcomes and impacts. This concept was well received by reviewers at the time, and the approach has subsequently gained considerable traction in CGIAR as a whole. FTA’s Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessment (MELIA) Program has actively adapted, developed, tested and refined a comprehensive set of concepts and methods, including using detailed, participatory theories of change; developing and refining actor-specific theory-based outcome evaluation methods; conducting a series of outcome evaluations of FTA research projects; systematically reviewing, defining and assessing the quality of research that crosses disciplinary boundaries (i.e. research for development); and developing, testing and refining a transdisciplinary research quality assessment framework. This work has generated valuable lessons about research design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation within FTA and beyond. Designing research in a way that allows intended contributions to be made explicit and testable increases the likelihood and the magnitude of positive outcomes and facilitates scaling. It also improves the ability to gather evidence, assess and communicate outcomes and impacts for enhanced accountability, and the capacity to learn from experience.
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
Download:
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/008227Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
Export citation:
RIS (.ris)
TI - FTA Highlight No.17 – Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessment
AU - Belcher, B.M.
AU - Coccia, F.
AU - Rouge, J-C.
AU - Gotor, E.
AB - The CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs) embodied a fundamental shift in the approach to research for development. In addition to producing highquality science, the CRPs explicitly assume shared responsibility for achieving economic and human development outcomes. This shift required new ways of working for positioning, prioritizing and planning of research, and better ways of monitoring and evaluating research. When the Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA) program was established in 2011 it responded to the latter challenge by proposing to develop and use theory-based approaches for monitoring and evaluating outcomes and impacts. This concept was well received by reviewers at the time, and the approach has subsequently gained considerable traction in CGIAR as a whole. FTA’s Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessment (MELIA) Program has actively adapted, developed, tested and refined a comprehensive set of concepts and methods, including using detailed, participatory theories of change; developing and refining actor-specific theory-based outcome evaluation methods; conducting a series of outcome evaluations of FTA research projects; systematically reviewing, defining and assessing the quality of research that crosses disciplinary boundaries (i.e. research for development); and developing, testing and refining a transdisciplinary research quality assessment framework. This work has generated valuable lessons about research design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation within FTA and beyond. Designing research in a way that allows intended contributions to be made explicit and testable increases the likelihood and the magnitude of positive outcomes and facilitates scaling. It also improves the ability to gather evidence, assess and communicate outcomes and impacts for enhanced accountability, and the capacity to learn from experience.
PY - 2021
PB - The CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA)
PP - Bogor, Indonesia
UR - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/8227/
DO - https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/008227
KW - evaluation, impact assessment, interdisciplinary research, methodology, monitoring, research and development
ER -Endnote (.ciw)
%T FTA Highlight No.17 – Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessment
%A Belcher, B.M.
%A Coccia, F.
%A Rouge, J-C.
%A Gotor, E.
%D 2021
%I The CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA)
%C Bogor, Indonesia
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/8227/
%R https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/008227
%X The CGIAR Research Programs (CRPs) embodied a fundamental shift in the approach to research for development. In addition to producing highquality science, the CRPs explicitly assume shared responsibility for achieving economic and human development outcomes. This shift required new ways of working for positioning, prioritizing and planning of research, and better ways of monitoring and evaluating research. When the Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA) program was established in 2011 it responded to the latter challenge by proposing to develop and use theory-based approaches for monitoring and evaluating outcomes and impacts. This concept was well received by reviewers at the time, and the approach has subsequently gained considerable traction in CGIAR as a whole. FTA’s Monitoring, Evaluation, Learning and Impact Assessment (MELIA) Program has actively adapted, developed, tested and refined a comprehensive set of concepts and methods, including using detailed, participatory theories of change; developing and refining actor-specific theory-based outcome evaluation methods; conducting a series of outcome evaluations of FTA research projects; systematically reviewing, defining and assessing the quality of research that crosses disciplinary boundaries (i.e. research for development); and developing, testing and refining a transdisciplinary research quality assessment framework. This work has generated valuable lessons about research design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation within FTA and beyond. Designing research in a way that allows intended contributions to be made explicit and testable increases the likelihood and the magnitude of positive outcomes and facilitates scaling. It also improves the ability to gather evidence, assess and communicate outcomes and impacts for enhanced accountability, and the capacity to learn from experience.
%K evaluation
%K impact assessment
%K interdisciplinary research
%K methodology
%K monitoring
%K research and development
Publisher
The CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA): Bogor, Indonesia
Publication year
2021
Authors
Belcher, B.M.; Coccia, F.; Rouge, J-C.; Gotor, E.
Language
English
Keywords
evaluation, impact assessment, interdisciplinary research, methodology, monitoring, research and development
