Key messages
- A science–policy dialogue platform fosters collaboration among scientists, policymakers and practitioners, promoting knowledge sharing and evidence-based policymaking to enhance effective REDD+ implementation.
- While promoting inclusive stakeholder engagement and context-specific policymaking, science–policy dialogues foster trust, alignment and informed decision making on REDD+ safeguards, benefit sharing and governance.
- Accessible research helps policymakers and subnational governments to apply REDD+ effectively and to close knowledge gaps. Continuous knowledge production and the translation of knowledge into policies and practices are essential.
- The science–policy dialogue is vital to achieving concrete action and implementation. After the dialogue, key relevant stakeholders recommended that CIFOR strengthen engagement with national decision makers to ensure that the scientific outputs inform policy.
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/009383Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
Export citation:
RIS (.ris)
TI - Bridging science and policy for effective REDD+ implementation: Multilevel dialogues and collaborative platforms in Indonesia
AU - Azzahra, M.
AU - Dwisatrio, B.
AU - Liswanti, N.
AU - Rouge, J-C.
AB - Key messages
A science–policy dialogue platform fosters collaboration among scientists, policymakers and practitioners, promoting knowledge sharing and evidence-based policymaking to enhance effective REDD+ implementation.
While promoting inclusive stakeholder engagement and context-specific policymaking, science–policy dialogues foster trust, alignment and informed decision making on REDD+ safeguards, benefit sharing and governance.
Accessible research helps policymakers and subnational governments to apply REDD+ effectively and to close knowledge gaps. Continuous knowledge production and the translation of knowledge into policies and practices are essential.
The science–policy dialogue is vital to achieving concrete action and implementation. After the dialogue, key relevant stakeholders recommended that CIFOR strengthen engagement with national decision makers to ensure that the scientific outputs inform policy.
PY - 2025
PB - CIFOR-ICRAF
PP - Bogor, Indonesia and Nairobi, Kenya
UR - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/9383/
DO - https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/009383
KW - access to information, knowledge management, policy analysis, policy making, project evaluation, redd-plus, research project, stakeholders
ER -Endnote (.ciw)
%T Bridging science and policy for effective REDD+ implementation: Multilevel dialogues and collaborative platforms in Indonesia
%A Azzahra, M.
%A Dwisatrio, B.
%A Liswanti, N.
%A Rouge, J-C.
%D 2025
%I CIFOR-ICRAF
%C Bogor, Indonesia and Nairobi, Kenya
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/9383/
%R https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/009383
%X Key messages
A science–policy dialogue platform fosters collaboration among scientists, policymakers and practitioners, promoting knowledge sharing and evidence-based policymaking to enhance effective REDD+ implementation.
While promoting inclusive stakeholder engagement and context-specific policymaking, science–policy dialogues foster trust, alignment and informed decision making on REDD+ safeguards, benefit sharing and governance.
Accessible research helps policymakers and subnational governments to apply REDD+ effectively and to close knowledge gaps. Continuous knowledge production and the translation of knowledge into policies and practices are essential.
The science–policy dialogue is vital to achieving concrete action and implementation. After the dialogue, key relevant stakeholders recommended that CIFOR strengthen engagement with national decision makers to ensure that the scientific outputs inform policy.
%K access to information
%K knowledge management
%K policy analysis
%K policy making
%K project evaluation
%K redd-plus
%K research project
%K stakeholders
Publisher
CIFOR-ICRAF: Bogor, Indonesia and Nairobi, Kenya
Publication year
2025
Authors
Azzahra, M.; Dwisatrio, B.; Liswanti, N.; Rouge, J-C.
Language
English
Keywords
access to information, knowledge management, policy analysis, policy making, project evaluation, redd-plus, research project, stakeholders
Geographic
Indonesia
