Capacity for Forestry Research in the Southern African Development CommunityG.S. Kowero and M.J. Spilsbury |
[Back to
OccPaper Top Page] [Chapter 1] [Chapter 2] [Chapter 3]
[Chapter 4] [Chapter 5]
Annex 1. Methodology and Indicators of Research Capacity Annex 2. Forestry Research Manpower in the SADC Region Annex 3. Values for Research Indicators by Institutes Annex 4. Institutes by Research Capacity Indicators Annex 5. Overview of Physical Resources by Institute Annex 6. Institutions Visited and those which Mailed Information List of Figures Figure 1. Distribution of forestry-related researchers in the SADC region Figure 3. Researchers, by institution, with M.Sc. or Ph.D. and at least 4 years experience Figure 4. Number of research staff by institute and budget per researcher List of Tables Table 1. Some positive and negative aspects of regional approaches Table 2. Distribution of research operational expenses in some institutions (%) Table 3. Research support facilities in sample institutions Table 4. Research interactions and their perceived value Table 5. Interactions with educational institutions and users of research results |
AcknowledgementsThis study was undertaken in ten of the twelve countries comprising the Southern African Development Community (SADC), with visits made to eight of them. Twenty-eight institutions were visited and two mailed data. The authors wish to thank the institutions and the many scientists who by generously supplying the data for this work and participating in a workshop which discussed the study findings re-affirmed its relevance to the region. The Division of Forest Science and Technology (FORESTEK) of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) of South Africa has been the CIFOR collaborator in this work. Together with CIFOR, FORESTEK developed a concept for this study in 1994, which was later developed by the authors into a research project. FORESTEK also participated in many other ways including the organisation of a workshop in which the results of this study were discussed. The authors would like to thank FORESTEK for these and many other contributions, which confirmed that collaborative research in the region is both workable and effective. |