| [Back to
    OccPaper Top Page] [Chapter 1]Introduction
 [Chapter 2]Previous Forestry Capacity-related Work in the SADC Region
 [Chapter 3]Methodology
 
      Survey of Methodologies Study Methodology Limitations of Study Methodology [Chapter 4]Results and Discussion
 
      Research Resources Research Environment [Chapter 5]Conclusions and Recommendations
 
      Conclusions Recommendations References Annex 1. Methodology and Indicators of Research
    Capacity Annex 2. Forestry Research Manpower in the SADC
    Region Annex 3. Values for Research Indicators by
    Institutes Annex 4. Institutes by Research Capacity
    Indicators Annex 5. Overview of Physical Resources by
    Institute Annex 6. Institutions Visited and those which
    Mailed Information 
 List of Figures Figure 1. Distribution of forestry-related
    researchers in the SADC region Figure 2. Distribution, by country, of
    researchers with M.Sc. or Ph.D. and more than years 4 experience Figure 3. Researchers, by institution, with
    M.Sc. or Ph.D. and at least 4 years experience Figure 4. Number of research staff by institute
    and budget per researcher 
 List of Tables Table 1. Some positive and negative aspects of
    regional approaches Table 2. Distribution of research operational
    expenses in some institutions (%) Table 3. Research support facilities in sample
    institutions Table 4. Research interactions and their
    perceived value Table 5. Interactions with educational
    institutions and users of research results Table 6. Salary and non-salary incentives Table 7. Use of formal and informal evaluations | 
      
        | Table 5. Interactions with educational institutions and users
        of research results  |  
        |  |  |  | 
          
            | % ofbudget
 | % ofstaff time
 |  |  
        | 
          
            | TAFORI NTSP
 SUA
 IRA
 U. ZIM
 ZIMFC
 ZAMBIA
 U. ZAMBIA
 FRIM
 CEF
 UEM
 USUTU
 FAB
 VELD
 FORSTEK
 ICFR
 U. STELLE
 NAMIBIA
 LESOTHO
 |  | 
          
            | 11
 2
 1
 n.a.
 1
 1
 2
 2
 1
 1
 0
 2
 0
 2
 2
 2
 2
 1
 | 22
 3
 2
 n.a.
 2
 1
 1
 3
 2
 2
 1
 3
 1
 3
 3
 2
 3
 2
 |  | 
          
            | 11
 2
 2
 1
 2
 1
 2
 2
 2
 2
 1
 2
 0
 2
 2
 2
 1
 1
 | 32
 3
 3
 3
 3
 2
 2
 2
 3
 3
 2
 2
 1
 3
 3
 3
 3
 2
 |  | 
          
            | 1012
 5
 20
 30
 5
 3
 20
 20
 10
 15
 5
 30
 60
 7
 20
 5
 n.a.
 1
 | 1010
 2
 30
 10
 20
 2
 10
 30
 5
 15
 30
 50
 40
 7
 20
 10
 n.a.
 20
 |  |  
        | 
          
            | Sample Total & Percentage With 0With 1
 With 2
 With 3
 |  | 
          
            | 18   2(11.1)8(44.4)
 8(44.4)
 n.a.
 | 18   n.a.4(22.2)
 8(44.4)
 6(33.3)
 |  | 
          
            | 19   1(0.05)7(36.8)
 11(57.9)
 n.a.
 | 19   n.a.1(0.05)
 7(36.8)
 11(52.6)
 |  |  |  In brackets are percentages Note:
 
      
        | A: Interaction 0 = never had interactions
 1 = occasional interactions
 2 = frequent interactions
 | B: Benefits: 1 = no real benefit
 2 = moderate benefit
 3 = very beneficial
 |  Own EDI = Own country educational institutionsFor. EDI = Foreign educational institutions.
 |