This chapter draws on four contrasting cases of value chain development (VCD) in Nicaragua to assess approaches and tools used in design and implementation. We interviewed 28 representatives from the international NGOs leading the interventions, the local NGOs that participated in implementation, principal buyers, and cooperatives. Despite the complexity of market systems, results showed a relatively basic approach to VCD, reflected in: 1) reliance on a single tool for design and implementation; 2) expected outcomes based on technical assistance and training for smallholders and cooperatives; 3) local NGOs and cooperatives with key roles in implementation; and 4) limited engagement with other chain actors, service providers, and researchers. We conclude with a call for a broader approach to VCD, based on a combination of tools to account for multiple, context-specific needs of diverse stakeholders, deeper collaboration between key actors within and outside the value chain, and evidence-based reflection and learning.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3362/9781788530576.008Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:
Publication year
2020
Authors
Donovan, J.; Stoian, D.; Poe, K.
Language
English
Keywords
value chain, development, agriculture, small enterprises, rural development, methodology, impact assessment
Geographic
Nicaragua
