{{menu_nowledge_desc}}.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Soil-water and root dynamics under hedgerow intercropping in semiarid Kenya

Export citation

Competition for growth resources between woody and crop species is said to be the main reason for failure of hedgerow intercropping (alleycropping) in semiarid tropics, but the mechanisms of competition are not clearly understood. In this study, conducted in the semiarid highlands of Kenya, soil-water changes and root dynamics were monitored during two rainy seasons from a long-term, replicated, alleycropping experiment. The treatments were (i) maize (Zea mays L.) grown alone, without fertilizer; (ii) maize, without fertilizer, intercropped between hedgerows of leucaena [Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit], with hedgerow prunings returned to the alleys; and (iii) maize grown alone, with fertilizer at 40 kg N and 18 kg P ha-1. Available water in 1.25 m of soil depth under alleycropping was lower than with maize alone. Depletion of soil water by hedgerows continued after maize harvest and carried water deficits in alleycropping from one season to the next. Leucaena provided 1.45 Mg ha-1 leaf biomass, which contained 41.6 kg N and 2.5 kg P ha-1; moreover, it added 0.51 Mg ha-1 season-1 of root biomass to the soil, equivalent to 7 kg N and 0.2 kg P ha-1. Therefore, N contributed through the alleycropping system was equivalent to the recommended fertilizer level; the system, however, did not meet the P requirements of the crop. Maize did not respond to fertilizer in both seasons, and the alleycropped maize yielded lower than the unfertilized maize.

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040003x
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:

Related publications