Explore eventos futuros e passados ​​em todo o mundo e online, sejam hospedados pelo CIFOR-ICRAF ou com a participação de nossos pesquisadores.

Découvrez les évènements passés et à venir dans le monde entier et en ligne, qu’ils soient organisés par le CIFOR-ICRAF ou auxquels participent nos chercheurs.

Jelajahi acara-acara mendatang dan yang telah lalu di lintas global dan daring, baik itu diselenggarakan oleh CIFOR-ICRAF atau dihadiri para peneliti kami.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

The potential for land exchange in communal areas to support the adoption of rainwater harvesting practices for crop production: A case study of thaba nchu, free state province

Export citation

Most of the arable communal lands in the former homeland areas in South Africa are currently either underutilised or abandoned. This paper describes a process of developing a land register and farmers’ preference for different mechanisms for transferring land use rights among members within the same community. Landowners in three Thaba Nchu villages, Free State, answered a semi-structured questionnaire to establish the sizes of arable land parcels, land utilisation patterns, and attitudes towards transactions in land use rights. There was interest in upscaling production; 73% of households would consider crop production if viable technologies were available. Most (68%) landholders would enter into one of the following transfer arrangements; sale (4%), lease (9%), sharecropping (65%) or free loan (22%). Selling and leasing were the least preferred. Households (74%) were also willing to transfer their rights for a maximum of 4yr; of these, 41% would lease their fields for 2–4yr and 33% for a maximum of 2yr. The results suggest that with appropriate institutions and institutional arrangements, a market for exchanges in land use rights may emerge, leading to increased utilisation of land and improved agricultural production.

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1683
Dimensions Citation Count:

Related publications