Découvrez les évènements passés et à venir dans le monde entier et en ligne, qu’ils soient organisés par le CIFOR-ICRAF ou auxquels participent nos chercheurs.

{{menu_nowledge_desc}}.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Retrospective on the hype: bottlenecks for Jatropha curcas bioenergy value chain development in Africa - a Kenyan case

Export citation

Jatropha curcas (Jatropha) a shrubby tree native to Central America thrives in many parts of the tropics and sub-tropics in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Asia. Though an essentially undomesticated shrub Jatropha suddenly emerged as a promising biodiesel feedstock during the period 2003-2009 when rising petrol prices fuelled global interests in bioenergy crops. Jatropha was claimed to produce high-quality oil and had a wide adaptability to diverse climatic zones and soil types minimum input requirements short gestation period easy multiplication drought tolerance pest and disease resistance and an ability to grow under marginal conditions without competition for resources for food production. It was considered a ‘silver bullet’ to solve energy insecurity in low-income countries and to support economic development. Similarly investors from developed nations were eager to grow it in large commercial plantations in SSA and elsewhere for export. However many claims made regarding Jatropha have proven highly exaggerated (GTZ 2009). After some years of plantation the Jatropha boom halted. By 2009 many media reports revealed disillusioning episodes across the developing world. Academics also began to question its commercial viability as a bioenergy feedstock with low yields (if no inputs) being a significant concern (GTZ 2009; Ariza-Montobbio and Lele 2010; Iiyama et al. 2013; NL Agency 2013). In SSA the Jatropha hype left many affected smallholder farmers confused and disillusioned. Yet few assessments (NL Agency 2013) have critically examined the crop’s rather disorganised promotion and analysed failures on the ground from the value chain (VC) perspective. Considering a Kenyan case we examine the following hypothesis: the recent Jatropha boom failed to deliver the claimed benefits for energy security and economic development because (i) the bioenergy VC remained under-developed in SSA and/or (ii) lacked the enabling environment present in other bioenergy VCs e.g. India.

Related publications