CIFOR-ICRAF publie chaque année plus de 750 publications sur l’agroforesterie, les forêts et le changement climatique, la restauration des paysages, les droits, la politique forestière et bien d’autres sujets encore, et ce dans plusieurs langues. .

CIFOR-ICRAF s’attaque aux défis et aux opportunités locales tout en apportant des solutions aux problèmes mondiaux concernant les forêts, les paysages, les populations et la planète.

Nous fournissons des preuves et des solutions concrètes pour transformer l’utilisation des terres et la production alimentaire : conserver et restaurer les écosystèmes, répondre aux crises mondiales du climat, de la malnutrition, de la biodiversité et de la désertification. En bref, nous améliorons la vie des populations.

Carbon markets and food systems

Carbon markets and food systems
Carbon markets are increasingly recognized as a central instrument of international climate cooperation, yet their potential to support the decarbonization of food systems remains largely untapped. Food systems—spanning agriculture, land use and land-use change and forestry, energy, industry, and waste—account for around one third of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, while offering substantial mitigation opportunities across production, value chains, and consumption. This paper provides one of the first comprehensive assessments of how food-system-related mitigation activities are represented in international carbon markets. Drawing on an original merged database covering more than 9,200 projects from both UNFCCC mechanisms (notably the Clean Development Mechanism) and major independent standards, it analyses nearly 4.9 GtCO₂e of issued carbon credits through a food- system lens. The study introduces a simplified typology of project scopes and types and examines the geographical, sectoral, and technological distribution of food-system-related projects. It shows that while food systems account for a significant share of credits—especially in independent mechanisms— carbon market activity remains highly concentrated geographically and skewed toward a limited number of project types, notably large-scale REDD+ and refrigeration projects. By contrast, major sources of food-system emissions at the farm gate and along food value chains—such as livestock methane, rice cultivation, food loss and waste, and household energy use—remain largely overlooked. The paper discusses the implications of these gaps for the environmental integrity and effectiveness of carbon markets and highlights the need for adapted methodologies, improved integration of small-scale projects, and greater alignment between compliance and voluntary markets. It concludes by outlining how carbon markets could more effectively contribute to food-system decarbonization while supporting sustainable development and food security.

This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/009429
Score Altmetric:
Dimensions Nombre de citations:


Exporter la citation:
TI  - Carbon markets and food systems 
AU  - Pingault, N. 
AU  - Martius, C. 
AB  - Carbon markets are increasingly recognized as a central instrument of international climate cooperation, yet their potential to support the decarbonization of food systems remains largely untapped. Food systems—spanning agriculture, land use and land-use change and forestry, energy, industry, and waste—account for around one third of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, while offering substantial mitigation opportunities across production, value chains, and consumption. This paper provides one of the first comprehensive assessments of how food-system-related mitigation activities are represented in international carbon markets. Drawing on an original merged database covering more than 9,200 projects from both UNFCCC mechanisms (notably the Clean Development Mechanism) and major independent standards, it analyses nearly 4.9 GtCO₂e of issued carbon credits through a food- system lens. The study introduces a simplified typology of project scopes and types and examines the geographical, sectoral, and technological distribution of food-system-related projects. It shows that while food systems account for a significant share of credits—especially in independent mechanisms— carbon market activity remains highly concentrated geographically and skewed toward a limited number of project types, notably large-scale REDD+ and refrigeration projects. By contrast, major sources of food-system emissions at the farm gate and along food value chains—such as livestock methane, rice cultivation, food loss and waste, and household energy use—remain largely overlooked. The paper discusses the implications of these gaps for the environmental integrity and effectiveness of carbon markets and highlights the need for adapted methodologies, improved integration of small-scale projects, and greater alignment between compliance and voluntary markets. It concludes by outlining how carbon markets could more effectively contribute to food-system decarbonization while supporting sustainable development and food security. 
PY  - 2026 
PB  - CIFOR-ICRAF 
PP  - Bogor, Indonesia and Nairobi, Kenya 
UR  - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/9429/ 
DO  - https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/009429 
KW  - agriculture, carbon, energy, food security, food systems, greenhouse gas emissions, industry, land use, mitigation, redd-plus, sustainable development, value chains, waste management 
ER  -
%T Carbon markets and food systems 
%A Pingault, N. 
%A Martius, C. 
%D 2026 
%I CIFOR-ICRAF 
%C Bogor, Indonesia and Nairobi, Kenya 
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/9429/ 
%R https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor-icraf/009429 
%X Carbon markets are increasingly recognized as a central instrument of international climate cooperation, yet their potential to support the decarbonization of food systems remains largely untapped. Food systems—spanning agriculture, land use and land-use change and forestry, energy, industry, and waste—account for around one third of global anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, while offering substantial mitigation opportunities across production, value chains, and consumption. This paper provides one of the first comprehensive assessments of how food-system-related mitigation activities are represented in international carbon markets. Drawing on an original merged database covering more than 9,200 projects from both UNFCCC mechanisms (notably the Clean Development Mechanism) and major independent standards, it analyses nearly 4.9 GtCO₂e of issued carbon credits through a food- system lens. The study introduces a simplified typology of project scopes and types and examines the geographical, sectoral, and technological distribution of food-system-related projects. It shows that while food systems account for a significant share of credits—especially in independent mechanisms— carbon market activity remains highly concentrated geographically and skewed toward a limited number of project types, notably large-scale REDD+ and refrigeration projects. By contrast, major sources of food-system emissions at the farm gate and along food value chains—such as livestock methane, rice cultivation, food loss and waste, and household energy use—remain largely overlooked. The paper discusses the implications of these gaps for the environmental integrity and effectiveness of carbon markets and highlights the need for adapted methodologies, improved integration of small-scale projects, and greater alignment between compliance and voluntary markets. It concludes by outlining how carbon markets could more effectively contribute to food-system decarbonization while supporting sustainable development and food security. 
%K agriculture 
%K carbon 
%K energy 
%K food security 
%K food systems 
%K greenhouse gas emissions 
%K industry 
%K land use 
%K mitigation 
%K redd-plus 
%K sustainable development 
%K value chains 
%K waste management 
    Publisher

    CIFOR-ICRAF: Bogor, Indonesia and Nairobi, Kenya

    Année de publication

    2026

    Auteurs

    Pingault, N.; Martius, C.

    Langue

    English

    Mots clés

    agriculture, carbon, energy, food security, food systems, greenhouse gas emissions, industry, land use, mitigation, redd-plus, sustainable development, value chains, waste management