CIFOR-ICRAF publie chaque année plus de 750 publications sur l’agroforesterie, les forêts et le changement climatique, la restauration des paysages, les droits, la politique forestière et bien d’autres sujets encore, et ce dans plusieurs langues. .

CIFOR-ICRAF s’attaque aux défis et aux opportunités locales tout en apportant des solutions aux problèmes mondiaux concernant les forêts, les paysages, les populations et la planète.

Nous fournissons des preuves et des solutions concrètes pour transformer l’utilisation des terres et la production alimentaire : conserver et restaurer les écosystèmes, répondre aux crises mondiales du climat, de la malnutrition, de la biodiversité et de la désertification. En bref, nous améliorons la vie des populations.

Ability of institutions to address new challenges

Ability of institutions to address new challenges
What types of institutional configurations hold the most promise in fostering efforts for long-term amelioration of enduring environmental, social, and economic challenges facing the world’s forests This chapter presents, and applies an analytical framework with which to review research findings and analyses that shed light on what appear to be the most promising institutional settings with which to address these drivers, ameliorate problems, and encourage responsible and sustainable forest management around the globe. Our framework focuses attention on the shift from government to governance; political authority; disentangling abstract policy for specific requirements; and capacity enhancing knowledge-generating and administrative institutions. We reveal that the global nature of economic, social, and environmental demands on the world’s forests, and complex commercial trade relationships, require that we integrate analyses of domestic and local responses to assess the role of innovative regional and global institutions designed to address these “good governance” challenges. We conclude by calling for much greater attention to the potential of synergistic institutional intersection to respond to new and enduring challenges in ways that single interventions or institutions are unable to do so.

Exporter la citation:
TI  - Ability of institutions to address new challenges 
AU  - Cashore, B. 
AU  - Galloway, G. 
AU  - Cubbage, F. 
AU  - Humphreys, D. 
AU  - Katila, P. 
AU  - Levin, K. 
AU  - Maryudi, A. 
AU  - McDermott, C. 
AU  - McGinley, K. 
AU  - Kengen, S. 
AU  - Medrado, M.J.S. 
AU  - Puente, M.C. 
AU  - Temu, A.B. 
AU  - Zanetti, E.A. 
AB  - What types of institutional configurations hold the most promise in fostering efforts for long-term amelioration of enduring environmental, social, and economic challenges facing the world’s forests This chapter presents, and applies an analytical framework with which to review research findings and analyses that shed light on what appear to be the most promising institutional settings with which to address these drivers, ameliorate problems, and encourage responsible and sustainable forest management around the globe. Our framework focuses attention on the shift from government to governance; political authority; disentangling abstract policy for specific requirements; and capacity enhancing knowledge-generating and administrative institutions. We reveal that the global nature of economic, social, and environmental demands on the world’s forests, and complex commercial trade relationships, require that we integrate analyses of domestic and local responses to assess the role of innovative regional and global institutions designed to address these “good governance” challenges. We conclude by calling for much greater attention to the potential of synergistic institutional intersection to respond to new and enduring challenges in ways that single interventions or institutions are unable to do so. 
PY  - 2010 
UR  - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/27755/ 
KW  - capacity building, certification, fleg-t, forest certification, forest governance institutions,, governance, institutional aspects, institutional intersection, multi-stakeholder dialogue, redd, research and capacity-building institutions, research institutions, tenure 
ER  -
%T Ability of institutions to address new challenges 
%A Cashore, B. 
%A Galloway, G. 
%A Cubbage, F. 
%A Humphreys, D. 
%A Katila, P. 
%A Levin, K. 
%A Maryudi, A. 
%A McDermott, C. 
%A McGinley, K. 
%A Kengen, S. 
%A Medrado, M.J.S. 
%A Puente, M.C. 
%A Temu, A.B. 
%A Zanetti, E.A. 
%D 2010 
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/27755/ 
%X What types of institutional configurations hold the most promise in fostering efforts for long-term amelioration of enduring environmental, social, and economic challenges facing the world’s forests This chapter presents, and applies an analytical framework with which to review research findings and analyses that shed light on what appear to be the most promising institutional settings with which to address these drivers, ameliorate problems, and encourage responsible and sustainable forest management around the globe. Our framework focuses attention on the shift from government to governance; political authority; disentangling abstract policy for specific requirements; and capacity enhancing knowledge-generating and administrative institutions. We reveal that the global nature of economic, social, and environmental demands on the world’s forests, and complex commercial trade relationships, require that we integrate analyses of domestic and local responses to assess the role of innovative regional and global institutions designed to address these “good governance” challenges. We conclude by calling for much greater attention to the potential of synergistic institutional intersection to respond to new and enduring challenges in ways that single interventions or institutions are unable to do so. 
%K capacity building 
%K certification 
%K fleg-t 
%K forest certification 
%K forest governance institutions, 
%K governance 
%K institutional aspects 
%K institutional intersection 
%K multi-stakeholder dialogue 
%K redd 
%K research and capacity-building institutions 
%K research institutions 
%K tenure