Forest carbon offsets have been criticised for overstated impacts, encouraging a shift from project-level schemes to jurisdictional programs intended to address deforestation drivers at scale. We evaluate the additionality of one of the first subnational initiatives to receive results-based payments: East Kalimantan's jurisdictional REDD+ program in Indonesia. Using remotely sensed data and the synthetic control method, we estimate counterfactual trends in deforestation and forest degradation over a two-year anticipation period and the full crediting period (2019–2024) and detect no statistically significant effects. These results suggest that observed declines in East Kalimantan reflect a broader nationwide reduction in deforestation plausibly driven by post-2015 policy reforms, with which the program's theory of change is intertwined. Consistent with this interpretation, complementary Bayesian structural time-series models, which do not rely on external controls and estimate the combined trajectory of deforestation under observed drivers, indicate that the intervention was associated with significant reductions in deforestation and forest degradation concentrated in the early years of the crediting period, but that these effects were not sustained. Together, these findings suggest that subnational jurisdictional programs operating in highly centralized governance systems may struggle to demonstrate additionality and claim credit at the subnational level, particularly when their theory of change is closely aligned with national policy reforms. Methodologically, our study demonstrates how combining counterfactual approaches with distinct comparison strategies can strengthen evaluation of large-scale climate policies and improve understanding of underlying impact mechanisms.
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109033Score Altmetric:
Dimensions Nombre de citations:
Exporter la citation:
RIS (.ris)
TI - Who gets credit for reduced deforestation? Evaluating additionality in subnational jurisdictional REDD+ under national policy reforms in Indonesia
AU - Chervier, C.
AU - Nofyanza, S.
AU - West, T.A.P.
AU - Sills, E.O.
AB - Forest carbon offsets have been criticised for overstated impacts, encouraging a shift from project-level schemes to jurisdictional programs intended to address deforestation drivers at scale. We evaluate the additionality of one of the first subnational initiatives to receive results-based payments: East Kalimantan's jurisdictional REDD+ program in Indonesia. Using remotely sensed data and the synthetic control method, we estimate counterfactual trends in deforestation and forest degradation over a two-year anticipation period and the full crediting period (2019–2024) and detect no statistically significant effects. These results suggest that observed declines in East Kalimantan reflect a broader nationwide reduction in deforestation plausibly driven by post-2015 policy reforms, with which the program's theory of change is intertwined. Consistent with this interpretation, complementary Bayesian structural time-series models, which do not rely on external controls and estimate the combined trajectory of deforestation under observed drivers, indicate that the intervention was associated with significant reductions in deforestation and forest degradation concentrated in the early years of the crediting period, but that these effects were not sustained. Together, these findings suggest that subnational jurisdictional programs operating in highly centralized governance systems may struggle to demonstrate additionality and claim credit at the subnational level, particularly when their theory of change is closely aligned with national policy reforms. Methodologically, our study demonstrates how combining counterfactual approaches with distinct comparison strategies can strengthen evaluation of large-scale climate policies and improve understanding of underlying impact mechanisms.
PY - 2026
UR - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/46550/
DO - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109033
KW - carbon offset, deforestation, degradation, degraded forests, evaluation, forest carbon, impact assessment, redd-plus
ER -Endnote (.ciw)
%T Who gets credit for reduced deforestation? Evaluating additionality in subnational jurisdictional REDD+ under national policy reforms in Indonesia
%A Chervier, C.
%A Nofyanza, S.
%A West, T.A.P.
%A Sills, E.O.
%D 2026
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/46550/
%R https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109033
%X Forest carbon offsets have been criticised for overstated impacts, encouraging a shift from project-level schemes to jurisdictional programs intended to address deforestation drivers at scale. We evaluate the additionality of one of the first subnational initiatives to receive results-based payments: East Kalimantan's jurisdictional REDD+ program in Indonesia. Using remotely sensed data and the synthetic control method, we estimate counterfactual trends in deforestation and forest degradation over a two-year anticipation period and the full crediting period (2019–2024) and detect no statistically significant effects. These results suggest that observed declines in East Kalimantan reflect a broader nationwide reduction in deforestation plausibly driven by post-2015 policy reforms, with which the program's theory of change is intertwined. Consistent with this interpretation, complementary Bayesian structural time-series models, which do not rely on external controls and estimate the combined trajectory of deforestation under observed drivers, indicate that the intervention was associated with significant reductions in deforestation and forest degradation concentrated in the early years of the crediting period, but that these effects were not sustained. Together, these findings suggest that subnational jurisdictional programs operating in highly centralized governance systems may struggle to demonstrate additionality and claim credit at the subnational level, particularly when their theory of change is closely aligned with national policy reforms. Methodologically, our study demonstrates how combining counterfactual approaches with distinct comparison strategies can strengthen evaluation of large-scale climate policies and improve understanding of underlying impact mechanisms.
%K carbon offset
%K deforestation
%K degradation
%K degraded forests
%K evaluation
%K forest carbon
%K impact assessment
%K redd-plus
Année de publication
2026
ISSN
0921-8009
Auteurs
Chervier, C.; Nofyanza, S.; West, T.A.P.; Sills, E.O.
Langue
English
Mots clés
carbon offset, deforestation, degradation, degraded forests, evaluation, forest carbon, impact assessment, redd-plus
Source
Ecological Economics. 247: 109033
Géographique
Indonesia
