{{menu_nowledge_desc}}.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Nitrogen uptake of maize (Zea mays) from isotope-labeled biomass of Paraserianthes falcataria grown under controlled conditions

Export citation

Roots can be an important though poorly quantified source of nitrogen (N) in agroforestry systems. Nitrogen uptake of maize using P. falcataria below- and aboveground biomass separately and their combination as source of N was assessed in a controlled experiment using 15N isotope labeling techniques. The 15N-direct and the 15N-indirect labeling techniques were compared for discrepancies in measuring N cycling from P. falcataria tree residues. N contribution to maize production was as follows; 40–57% from below ground biomass and 10–18% from above ground biomass (P < 0.05). Residue N use efficiency (%rNE) by maize was between 99 and 106% for belowground biomass 4–4.5% for aboveground biomass. This implies that though nutrient release characteristics of aboveground biomass are commonly used as a basis for selection of agroforestry trees those of belowground biomass would be of fundamental importance as well. Combining P. falcataria below and aboveground biomass did not result in significant (P < 0.05) effects on N recovered by maize suggesting the absence of decomposition interactions between the two bio-chemically contrasting residues. There were no significant methodological differences reflected in measured N cycled by maize from leaves (Ndfr); 15% and 18% as estimated by 15N direct and indirect method respectively. The two methods compared very well (P < 0.05) as tools of estimating N cycling from surface applied leaves. However the ability of the direct method to measure N without disturbing either the tree or the soil would make it a more attractive and valuable tool in N cycling studies in agroforestry systems.

DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1023940602481
Altmetric score:
Dimensions Citation Count:

    Publication year

    2003

    Authors

    Chintu, R.; Zaharah, A.R.

    Keywords

    Agroforestry, Biomass, Nitrogen, Nitrogen cycle, Plant residues, Zea mays

Related publications