CIFOR-ICRAF publie chaque année plus de 750 publications sur l’agroforesterie, les forêts et le changement climatique, la restauration des paysages, les droits, la politique forestière et bien d’autres sujets encore, et ce dans plusieurs langues. .

CIFOR-ICRAF s’attaque aux défis et aux opportunités locales tout en apportant des solutions aux problèmes mondiaux concernant les forêts, les paysages, les populations et la planète.

Nous fournissons des preuves et des solutions concrètes pour transformer l’utilisation des terres et la production alimentaire : conserver et restaurer les écosystèmes, répondre aux crises mondiales du climat, de la malnutrition, de la biodiversité et de la désertification. En bref, nous améliorons la vie des populations.

Are traditional agroforestry systems nature-based carbon sinks? Empirical evidence from Tanzania

Are traditional agroforestry systems nature-based carbon sinks? Empirical evidence from Tanzania
Traditional agroforestry systems (TAFS) in Tanzania—Alalili, Ngitili, and Faidherbia parkland—play a critical role in biodiversity conservation, rural livelihoods, and climate change mitigation. This study quantified their carbon sequestration potential using field data from 48 plots. Results showed significant variation in total carbon stocks, with Faidherbia parkland storing the most (151.91 Mg C ha⁻¹) due to large-diameter trees, while Ngitili stored the least (17.96 Mg C ha⁻¹) despite higher stem density. These findings highlight TAFS as valuable nature-based carbon sinks and support their integration into climate strategies such as REDD+ and carbon farming. Strengthening TAFS can yield co-benefits for carbon storage, ecosystem services, and sustainable development.

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01241-5
Score Altmetric:
Dimensions Nombre de citations:


Exporter la citation:
TI  - Are traditional agroforestry systems nature-based carbon sinks? Empirical evidence from Tanzania 
AU  - Andrew, S.M. 
AU  - Mpelangwa, E.M. 
AU  - Kimaro, A.A. 
AB  - Traditional agroforestry systems (TAFS) in Tanzania—Alalili, Ngitili, and Faidherbia parkland—play a critical role in biodiversity conservation, rural livelihoods, and climate change mitigation. This study quantified their carbon sequestration potential using field data from 48 plots. Results showed significant variation in total carbon stocks, with Faidherbia parkland storing the most (151.91 Mg C ha⁻¹) due to large-diameter trees, while Ngitili stored the least (17.96 Mg C ha⁻¹) despite higher stem density. These findings highlight TAFS as valuable nature-based carbon sinks and support their integration into climate strategies such as REDD+ and carbon farming. Strengthening TAFS can yield co-benefits for carbon storage, ecosystem services, and sustainable development. 
PY  - 2025 
UR  - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/44721/ 
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01241-5 
KW  - agroforestry, biomass, carbon sequestration, climate change mitigation, ecosystem services, forest ecosystems, land management, redd-plus, rural livelihoods, traditional knowledge 
ER  -
%T Are traditional agroforestry systems nature-based carbon sinks? Empirical evidence from Tanzania 
%A Andrew, S.M. 
%A Mpelangwa, E.M. 
%A Kimaro, A.A. 
%D 2025 
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/44721/ 
%R https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-025-01241-5 
%X Traditional agroforestry systems (TAFS) in Tanzania—Alalili, Ngitili, and Faidherbia parkland—play a critical role in biodiversity conservation, rural livelihoods, and climate change mitigation. This study quantified their carbon sequestration potential using field data from 48 plots. Results showed significant variation in total carbon stocks, with Faidherbia parkland storing the most (151.91 Mg C ha⁻¹) due to large-diameter trees, while Ngitili stored the least (17.96 Mg C ha⁻¹) despite higher stem density. These findings highlight TAFS as valuable nature-based carbon sinks and support their integration into climate strategies such as REDD+ and carbon farming. Strengthening TAFS can yield co-benefits for carbon storage, ecosystem services, and sustainable development. 
%K agroforestry 
%K biomass 
%K carbon sequestration 
%K climate change mitigation 
%K ecosystem services 
%K forest ecosystems 
%K land management 
%K redd-plus 
%K rural livelihoods 
%K traditional knowledge 
    Année de publication

    2025

    ISSN

    0167-4366

    Auteurs

    Andrew, S.M.; Mpelangwa, E.M.; Kimaro, A.A.

    Langue

    English

    Mots clés

    agroforestry, biomass, carbon sequestration, climate change mitigation, ecosystem services, forest ecosystems, land management, redd-plus, rural livelihoods, traditional knowledge

    Source

    Agroforestry Systems. 99(6): 145

    Géographique

    Tanzania