REDD+ finance is at an inflection point: while short-term finance is available, disbursements are slow and investment opportunities scarce; at the same time, there is no adequate and predictable long-term strategy to meet the financial needs of REDD+.
In the absence of ambitious climate change mitigation goals, for the foreseeable future most REDD+ finance will be mobilised by the public sector. During this interim phase, in which financing for REDD+ is likely to be fragmented and channelled through various agencies, it will be important to test a variety of financing options that leverage private sector finance and directly address the drivers of deforestation.
Wealthier REDD+ countries with stronger institutions may opt to selffinance a significant part of REDD+. They may also choose to engage in results-based agreements with donors and international agencies. The more fragile states are likely to rely on official development assistance (ODA)- type finance, which combines financial support with technical assistance and policy guidance. Download:
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
Exporter la citation:
RIS (.ris)
TI - REDD+の資金調達
AU - Streck, C.
AU - Parker, C.
AB - REDD+ finance is at an inflection point: while short-term finance is available, disbursements are slow and investment opportunities scarce; at the same time, there is no adequate and predictable long-term strategy to meet the financial needs of REDD+. In the absence of ambitious climate change mitigation goals, for the foreseeable future most REDD+ finance will be mobilised by the public sector. During this interim phase, in which financing for REDD+ is likely to be fragmented and channelled through various agencies, it will be important to test a variety of financing options that leverage private sector finance and directly address the drivers of deforestation. Wealthier REDD+ countries with stronger institutions may opt to selffinance a significant part of REDD+. They may also choose to engage in results-based agreements with donors and international agencies. The more fragile states are likely to rely on official development assistance (ODA)- type finance, which combines financial support with technical assistance and policy guidance.
PY - 2015
PB - Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
PP - Bogor, Indonesia
UR - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/5446/
KW - redd+
ER -Endnote (.ciw)
%T REDD+の資金調達
%A Streck, C.
%A Parker, C.
%D 2015
%I Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
%C Bogor, Indonesia
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/5446/
%X REDD+ finance is at an inflection point: while short-term finance is available, disbursements are slow and investment opportunities scarce; at the same time, there is no adequate and predictable long-term strategy to meet the financial needs of REDD+. In the absence of ambitious climate change mitigation goals, for the foreseeable future most REDD+ finance will be mobilised by the public sector. During this interim phase, in which financing for REDD+ is likely to be fragmented and channelled through various agencies, it will be important to test a variety of financing options that leverage private sector finance and directly address the drivers of deforestation. Wealthier REDD+ countries with stronger institutions may opt to selffinance a significant part of REDD+. They may also choose to engage in results-based agreements with donors and international agencies. The more fragile states are likely to rely on official development assistance (ODA)- type finance, which combines financial support with technical assistance and policy guidance.
%K redd+
Année de publication
2015
Auteurs
Langue
Japanese
Mots clés
redd+
Source
Analysing REDD+: Challenges and choices. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia
