Key messages
- In Indonesia, early involvement and support for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) has led to numerous achievements, but progress has been slower than anticipated.
- National and subnational REDD+ initiatives are susceptible to political turnover at each election cycle. To ensure its longevity, REDD+ needs to be embedded in national and regional laws, regulations, institutions and other state devices.
- REDD+ institutionalization in Indonesia has focused on technicalities rather than on directly addressing socioeconomic and political drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. The rate of deforestation has decelerated enough to result in two REDD+ payments. However, transformational change in the forestry and broader land-use sector has not progressed far enough.
- REDD+ is inherently multilevel and multisectoral. However, much information, action, knowledge exchange and decision making on REDD+ is concentrated within relatively few organizations. Transformational change requires that other stakeholders and sectors that impact forests get involved.
Download:
This work is licensed under CC-BY 4.0
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007880Score Altmetric:
Dimensions Nombre de citations:
Exporter la citation:
RIS (.ris)
TI - Revisiting the REDD+ experience in Indonesia: Lessons from national, subnational and local implementation
AU - Nofyanza, S.
AU - Moeliono, M.
AU - Selviana, V.
AU - Dwisatrio, B.
AU - Liswanti, N.
AU - Tamara, A.
AU - Komalasari, M.
AB - Key messages
In Indonesia, early involvement and support for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) has led to numerous achievements, but progress has been slower than anticipated.
National and subnational REDD+ initiatives are susceptible to political turnover at each election cycle. To ensure its longevity, REDD+ needs to be embedded in national and regional laws, regulations, institutions and other state devices.
REDD+ institutionalization in Indonesia has focused on technicalities rather than on directly addressing socioeconomic and political drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. The rate of deforestation has decelerated enough to result in two REDD+ payments. However, transformational change in the forestry and broader land-use sector has not progressed far enough.
REDD+ is inherently multilevel and multisectoral. However, much information, action, knowledge exchange and decision making on REDD+ is concentrated within relatively few organizations. Transformational change requires that other stakeholders and sectors that impact forests get involved.
PY - 2020
PB - Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
PP - Bogor, Indonesia
UR - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/7880/
DO - https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007880
KW - climate change, decision making, development policy, mitigation, national planning, redd+
ER -Endnote (.ciw)
%T Revisiting the REDD+ experience in Indonesia: Lessons from national, subnational and local implementation
%A Nofyanza, S.
%A Moeliono, M.
%A Selviana, V.
%A Dwisatrio, B.
%A Liswanti, N.
%A Tamara, A.
%A Komalasari, M.
%D 2020
%I Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR)
%C Bogor, Indonesia
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/7880/
%R https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007880
%X Key messages
In Indonesia, early involvement and support for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) has led to numerous achievements, but progress has been slower than anticipated.
National and subnational REDD+ initiatives are susceptible to political turnover at each election cycle. To ensure its longevity, REDD+ needs to be embedded in national and regional laws, regulations, institutions and other state devices.
REDD+ institutionalization in Indonesia has focused on technicalities rather than on directly addressing socioeconomic and political drivers of deforestation and forest degradation. The rate of deforestation has decelerated enough to result in two REDD+ payments. However, transformational change in the forestry and broader land-use sector has not progressed far enough.
REDD+ is inherently multilevel and multisectoral. However, much information, action, knowledge exchange and decision making on REDD+ is concentrated within relatively few organizations. Transformational change requires that other stakeholders and sectors that impact forests get involved.
%K climate change
%K decision making
%K development policy
%K mitigation
%K national planning
%K redd+
Publisher
Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR): Bogor, Indonesia
Année de publication
2020
Auteurs
Nofyanza, S.; Moeliono, M.; Selviana, V.; Dwisatrio, B.; Liswanti, N.; Tamara, A.; Komalasari, M.
Langue
English
Mots clés
climate change, decision making, development policy, mitigation, national planning, redd+
Géographique
Indonesia
