CIFOR-ICRAF publie chaque année plus de 750 publications sur l’agroforesterie, les forêts et le changement climatique, la restauration des paysages, les droits, la politique forestière et bien d’autres sujets encore, et ce dans plusieurs langues. .

CIFOR-ICRAF s’attaque aux défis et aux opportunités locales tout en apportant des solutions aux problèmes mondiaux concernant les forêts, les paysages, les populations et la planète.

Nous fournissons des preuves et des solutions concrètes pour transformer l’utilisation des terres et la production alimentaire : conserver et restaurer les écosystèmes, répondre aux crises mondiales du climat, de la malnutrition, de la biodiversité et de la désertification. En bref, nous améliorons la vie des populations.

Forests, trees and poverty alleviation: Policy implications of current knowledge

Forests, trees and poverty alleviation: Policy implications of current knowledge
Major advances have been made over the past two decades in our understanding of the contribution forests and trees outside forests make to human well-being across the globe. Yet this knowledge has not always been incorporated into broader poverty and development policy agendas. The result is a missed opportunity to effectively and sustainably reach national and international poverty alleviation goals. Here, we address the need for greater integration of forests and trees in development policy. We distil five key findings based on the current evidence base and discuss their implications for decision-makers. We find that (1) forests and trees are critical to global efforts to end poverty but (2) their benefits to human well-being are unevenly distributed. Although the evidence indicates that (3) forests and trees can help the rural poor as they face profound global changes, it also shows that (4) poorly aligned forest and land use policies and programmes may lead to excessive costs being borne by the poor. However, we do find that (5) policy and management measures exist that can enable forests and trees to effectively address poverty goals even as there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution. Key overarching policy implications of these findings include the need to integrate forests and trees more explicitly into land-use planning and poverty reduction programs, strengthen forest property rights, self-governance and technical skills of forest-reliant communities, and carefully tailor policy measures to the context in which they are implemented.

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102566
Score Altmetric:
Dimensions Nombre de citations:


Exporter la citation:
TI  - Forests, trees and poverty alleviation: Policy implications of current knowledge 
AU  - Miller, D.C. 
AU  - Mansourian, S. 
AU  - Gabay, M. 
AU  - Hajjar, R. 
AU  - Jagger, P. 
AU  - Kamoto, J.F.M. 
AU  - Newton, P. 
AU  - Oldekop, J.A. 
AU  - Razafindratsima, O.H. 
AU  - Shyamsundar, P. 
AU  - Sunderland, T.C.H. 
AU  - Wildburger, C. 
AB  - Major advances have been made over the past two decades in our understanding of the contribution forests and trees outside forests make to human well-being across the globe. Yet this knowledge has not always been incorporated into broader poverty and development policy agendas. The result is a missed opportunity to effectively and sustainably reach national and international poverty alleviation goals. Here, we address the need for greater integration of forests and trees in development policy. We distil five key findings based on the current evidence base and discuss their implications for decision-makers. We find that (1) forests and trees are critical to global efforts to end poverty but (2) their benefits to human well-being are unevenly distributed. Although the evidence indicates that (3) forests and trees can help the rural poor as they face profound global changes, it also shows that (4) poorly aligned forest and land use policies and programmes may lead to excessive costs being borne by the poor. However, we do find that (5) policy and management measures exist that can enable forests and trees to effectively address poverty goals even as there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution. Key overarching policy implications of these findings include the need to integrate forests and trees more explicitly into land-use planning and poverty reduction programs, strengthen forest property rights, self-governance and technical skills of forest-reliant communities, and carefully tailor policy measures to the context in which they are implemented. 
PY  - 2021 
UR  - https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/8167/ 
DO  - https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102566 
KW  - agroforestry, forest management, forest policy, land use, livelihoods, poverty, sustainable development 
ER  -
%T Forests, trees and poverty alleviation: Policy implications of current knowledge 
%A Miller, D.C. 
%A Mansourian, S. 
%A Gabay, M. 
%A Hajjar, R. 
%A Jagger, P. 
%A Kamoto, J.F.M. 
%A Newton, P. 
%A Oldekop, J.A. 
%A Razafindratsima, O.H. 
%A Shyamsundar, P. 
%A Sunderland, T.C.H. 
%A Wildburger, C. 
%D 2021 
%U https://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/8167/ 
%R https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102566 
%X Major advances have been made over the past two decades in our understanding of the contribution forests and trees outside forests make to human well-being across the globe. Yet this knowledge has not always been incorporated into broader poverty and development policy agendas. The result is a missed opportunity to effectively and sustainably reach national and international poverty alleviation goals. Here, we address the need for greater integration of forests and trees in development policy. We distil five key findings based on the current evidence base and discuss their implications for decision-makers. We find that (1) forests and trees are critical to global efforts to end poverty but (2) their benefits to human well-being are unevenly distributed. Although the evidence indicates that (3) forests and trees can help the rural poor as they face profound global changes, it also shows that (4) poorly aligned forest and land use policies and programmes may lead to excessive costs being borne by the poor. However, we do find that (5) policy and management measures exist that can enable forests and trees to effectively address poverty goals even as there is no ‘one size fits all’ solution. Key overarching policy implications of these findings include the need to integrate forests and trees more explicitly into land-use planning and poverty reduction programs, strengthen forest property rights, self-governance and technical skills of forest-reliant communities, and carefully tailor policy measures to the context in which they are implemented. 
%K agroforestry 
%K forest management 
%K forest policy 
%K land use 
%K livelihoods 
%K poverty 
%K sustainable development