CIFOR-ICRAF s’attaque aux défis et aux opportunités locales tout en apportant des solutions aux problèmes mondiaux concernant les forêts, les paysages, les populations et la planète.

Nous fournissons des preuves et des solutions concrètes pour transformer l’utilisation des terres et la production alimentaire : conserver et restaurer les écosystèmes, répondre aux crises mondiales du climat, de la malnutrition, de la biodiversité et de la désertification. En bref, nous améliorons la vie des populations.

CIFOR-ICRAF publie chaque année plus de 750 publications sur l’agroforesterie, les forêts et le changement climatique, la restauration des paysages, les droits, la politique forestière et bien d’autres sujets encore, et ce dans plusieurs langues. .

CIFOR-ICRAF s’attaque aux défis et aux opportunités locales tout en apportant des solutions aux problèmes mondiaux concernant les forêts, les paysages, les populations et la planète.

Nous fournissons des preuves et des solutions concrètes pour transformer l’utilisation des terres et la production alimentaire : conserver et restaurer les écosystèmes, répondre aux crises mondiales du climat, de la malnutrition, de la biodiversité et de la désertification. En bref, nous améliorons la vie des populations.

CIFOR–ICRAF publishes over 750 publications every year on agroforestry, forests and climate change, landscape restoration, rights, forest policy and much more – in multiple languages.

CIFOR–ICRAF addresses local challenges and opportunities while providing solutions to global problems for forests, landscapes, people and the planet.

We deliver actionable evidence and solutions to transform how land is used and how food is produced: conserving and restoring ecosystems, responding to the global climate, malnutrition, biodiversity and desertification crises. In short, improving people’s lives.

Dynamics of landcare groups in Lantapan

Exporter la citation

Landcare commenced in Lantapan Municipality in the southern Philippines in 1998. Within two years there were 62 groups linke d in a municipal association. These groups successfully shared conservation practices and worked together in establishing contoured farms and agroforestry nurserie s. However, many groups became inactive once the initial adoption of conservation farming had occurred. A participatory evaluation undertaken five years after th e commencement of Landcare included case studies of 12 groups, ranging from those that we re continuing to develop to those that had disbanded. Groups in the former categor y tended to be in stable, cohesive communities, had an effective local leader , and were highly focused on own-account farming. They were also in re gular contact with Landcare f acilitators and continued to benefit from the wider Landcare Program. Disbanded groups were often hampered by poor leadership, factionalism, lack of follow-up, and a loss of interest once conservation practices had been implemen ted. Members of some disbanded groups were affected by dependence on banana planta tions or vegetable tr aders, or lacked secure tenure. Both continuing and disb anded groups expressed a need for on-going links with the Landcare Program. The lessons are that Landcare activities need to be adapted to changing livelihood strategies and that continued investment in bridging social capital is key to sustaining Landcare in the Philippines context

Publications connexes